LeBron James has decided to switch to the number 6 after the 2009-10 season, out of respect for Michael Jordan. Conspiracy theorist would wonder if this means he's considering a move to Chicago, where he couldn't wear the number anyway, but that's a bit of a reach. Or, maybe not.

 

LeBron hinted months ago that he was pondering changing his number to pay homage to, arguably, the greatest player who's ever graced us with his talent, on the hardwood. Some have even suggested that the NBA should consider retiring Jordan's number, out of respect of course. Since then, I've been asked that question through e-mail and just in passing.

 

My answer, "No." There's no debating this. Why would you retire Michael Jordan's number throughout the National Basketball Association? What's he done, other than play great basketball? Is the number of the greatest baseball player retired? Has the National Football League retired anyone's number, league-wide? The answer is no.

 

Jackie Robinson's number is retired, but there's a reason that extends beyond what the man did on the field. In fact, what he did on the field has nothing to do with Bud Selig honoring Robinson. Jackie Robinson's number 42 is retired because he was a pioneer. His life was bigger than his playing career. His selflessness ushered in a movement not only in sports, but in our society.

 

Some would even say Jackie Robinson was the father of the Civil Rights movement. His playing career transcends the game of baseball. Yes, in many ways, Michael Jordan's career did the same, as the "Jump Man" logo became pop culture. However, did Michael Jordan's career change people's lives? You know the answer to that question. Therefore, not wearing Jordan's number should continue to be an individual decision, and not a league-wide decision.

 

Rob Long